my favorite use for a coding agent is korean rom-coms

what happens when you build a spoiler-bounded multimodal context protocol for korean romantic subtext

A collage of Korean romantic-comedy artwork connected by fine data lines and bracketed interface marks

About 6 months ago, I started watching Kdramas and got confused by a bowl of ramen, and since then, I’ve collected dozens of scene notes, written a custom media-player script, built a taste file explaining my type, and given Codex enough context about my romantic life that some of its conclusions will never leave my laptop.

So how the hell did watching television turn into a software project?

10 seconds of eye contact

Korean shows leave much longer gaps between lines than the Western shows I grew up with, and 6 months in, I still haven’t adjusted.

2 characters lock eyes and hold it for 10 full seconds, and when somebody finally looks away, the other notices and neither of them breaks the awkward silence. Most Western rom-coms I grew up with would’ve cut away 7 seconds ago, but Korean television gives me enough time to see who broke eye contact.

They spend 10 seconds looking at each other, and neither one says anything.

I understood something in those 10 seconds because of everything that had happened earlier, but I couldn’t point to a single line of dialogue that had told me. The subtitles gave me the words and left out what those words meant between these 2 characters.

As you go through this article, you’ll see this workflow marker show up.

  1. Something Codex could already do.
  2. The new ability I just added.

I’m going to do my best to explain how my Codex workflow gets more capable as we go, with the older abilities in regular type and whatever I just added in bold.

the subtitles are technically correct

I don’t understand Korean, so I needed English subtitles, and every so often, the subtitle looked completely ordinary while everybody on screen suddenly froze or started yelling.

About 3 or 4 weeks into my first Kdrama, I got annoyed enough to open Codex, and a long-running chat had already helped me build software, so why not use one for Korean romantic subtext?

At first, I told Codex what I was watching and roughly how far I’d gotten, and anything after that point was off-limits. I’d dictate whatever I thought I’d just seen and go back to the show as soon as Codex filled in the missing context.

I asked why a perfectly normal offer of ramen had made everybody lose their minds.

Poor Mi-so. Ramen has consequences.
Why Mi-so's sister got angry about the ramen
  1. You

    I'm watching What's Wrong with Secretary Kim, S01E05, maybe 5 or 10 minutes in. Mi-so says she made ramen for CEO dude late at night, and her sister goes ballistic. I get why her older sister is concerned that CEO dude was over that late, but why does she seem angrier about the ramen?

  2. Codex

    Mi-so tells her sister that Young-joon (CEO dude) came to her apartment late at night and she made him ramen. In Korea, inviting a guy inside for ramen is basically “Netflix and chill.” Mi-so thinks she's reporting a meal, and her sister hears this.

    “CEO dude came over late, we had sex, and then I made him noodles. Why are you hitting me?”

    Mi-so knows what sex is. Nobody told her ramen is the euphemism, which means she accidentally propositioned her boss and then served him actual noodles. Her sister now has to explain why “I only fed him ramen” isn't helping.

Then the pillow fight happened.

Why the Moon Rabbit argument ended in a pillow fight
  1. You

    I'm watching The Story of Park's Marriage Contract, S01E06, somewhere around the middle. They seemed to be having a normal argument, then out of nowhere somebody said rabbits on the moon aren't real, then there was something about formalities, then she went ape-shit and started attacking him. With a pillow. What fresh hell just unfolded in front of me?

  2. Codex

    Yeon-woo, the female lead, is a royal princess who time-traveled from the 1400s into modern Seoul. She and Tae-ha, the male lead, are already arguing when he decides this is the exact moment to explain that the Moon Rabbit isn't real. The Moon Rabbit is a Korean folklore figure that makes rice cakes on the moon. A grown woman from the 1400s would easily believe that's entirely true. In his frustration, he drops the honorifics too.

    So, basically, he has looked a sweet, innocent child dead in the eyes and said this.

    “Hey, asshole, Santa Claus is bullshit.”

    Formal speech is a huge deal in Korean society now, and Yeon-woo comes from an era where social hierarchy controlled basically every conversation. In her world, that's close to a mortal offense. That man is lucky that the only thing she could find to hit him with was a pillow.

I gave every show its own chat, and early on, Codex had my rough speech-to-text description plus whatever it already knew or could find online, and that was usually enough to explain the social cue I’d missed.

Some answers took 30 seconds, other times I looked up 30 minutes later and realized I was still reading about Korean honorifics because 2 characters had dropped them in the middle of a pillow fight.

Giving Codex the context by hand

I described the scene and set the spoiler cutoff for every question.

  1. Answer a spoiler-safe question about a scene.

sometimes there isn’t even a question

Sometimes, I wasn’t looking for an answer, I just wanted to use Codex like a journal, so I got into the habit of starting every show chat with the same rule.

Setting the no-spoilers note-taking rule
  1. You

    I'm just making notes as I watch. I don't need you to explain anything or tell me what happens next, just remember whatever I give you in this chat in case I want to come back to it later.

Saving a Cinderella at 2 AM reaction for later
  1. You

    I'm on S01E01 of Cinderella at 2 AM. I'm just making notes. Yun-seo is trying to break up with Ju-won, then a coworker starts trash-talking him and her face immediately gives her away. She is handling this breakup very normally.

  2. Codex

    Yeah, that face is not helping her case. I've got it.

6 episodes into the same show’s chat

Those little entries piled up fast, and by episode 9 of Something About 1 Percent, I’d spent 6 episodes dictating reactions into the same chat, including plenty I’d forgotten. I asked about 3 forms of address at once, and Codex already knew who the couple was, how their contract had started, what they’d argued about, and which promises they were pretending not to care about.

Asking what Jae-in-ah, oppa, and ajussi mean
  1. You

    I'm watching Something About 1 Percent, S01E09. Da-hyun gets mad when another woman calls Jae-in "Jae-in-ah," then she brings up "oppa" and calls him "ajussi." What do any of those mean? What the heck is an "ajussi," and is that some kind of downgrade from "oppa"?

Da-hyun would like everyone to know this is a fairness issue. Please ignore her face.
How Codex used the show history to explain the honorifics
  1. Codex

    “Jae-in-ah” can come from a man or a woman. The “-ah” gets attached to a name when you're addressing a close friend or somebody younger, so another woman using it with Jae-in, the male lead, sounds very familiar.

    “Oppa” goes from a younger woman to an older man. It can be affectionate and completely platonic, or it can be flirtatious, and the context tells you which. That's why it causes so much tension in romantic comedies, everybody has to figure out which kind she means.

    “Ajussi” can be used by anyone addressing an older man, and it's much closer to “mister” or “middle-aged man.” So yes, going from oppa to ajussi is a brutal downgrade.

    Earlier in this chat, you'd noted that Da-hyun, the female lead, had stopped calling other men oppa because Jae-in asked her to. Now she wants the same rule to apply when another woman calls him Jae-in-ah. Their relationship is supposed to be a contract, neither of them is supposed to have real feelings, and by now both of them are doing a terrible job of pretending otherwise.

If I’d started a fresh chat, Codex could’ve defined the words and stopped there.

I’m terrible at remembering Korean names, but Codex had enough context to figure out who I meant anyway.

Describing Cheon Song-yi as a furious caterpillar
  1. You

    Wait, what's-her-face, the famous actress who gets trapped in a sleeping bag and wriggles across the floor like a furious caterpillar, still yelling at the alien guy like she's completely in control. What's her name again?

I swear, this scene makes perfect sense in context.
How Codex identified Cheon Song-yi from my description
  1. Codex

    You're almost certainly thinking of Jun Ji-hyun, who plays Cheon Song-yi, the female lead from My Love from the Star.

    You've spent half this chat describing her as helpless and still somehow bossy, so yes, I knew exactly who you meant.

Using the show chat's history

One chat per show let later questions use earlier scenes and reactions.

  1. Answer a spoiler-safe question about a scene.
  2. Use earlier context from the same show.

Codex got the right actress from an awful description that would’ve been useless in a search box, so I got bolder and asked about every little Korean television detail I’d usually shrug at and forget.

the sandwich is sponsored, the car is wearing a fake mustache

Subway is impossible to ignore once you start watching Korean TV, and it looks strange enough to Western audiences that John Oliver spent a segment explaining it. The logo keeps appearing behind completely serious conversations while actors hold the sandwiches towards the camera, and nobody on screen acts like any of this is strange.

Why Subway appears in so many Kdramas
  1. You

    Why the hell does Subway keep appearing so prominently? Is it satire that's just really subtle? Am I supposed to laugh?

  2. Codex

    Nope. Subway has paid for product placement in Korean dramas for years. Everyone really is playing it straight.

  3. You

    So what's the point? Is it just for promotional purposes?

  4. Codex

    Not quite. The sponsorship is why Subway keeps appearing, and the setting serves a distinct thematic purpose.

    A convenience store, something like a 7-Eleven, would feel very casual. An upscale restaurant would make the conversation feel like an occasion, maybe even a date. Subway sits in the middle, the characters can eat and talk without the setting making the conversation feel romantic.

For comparison, Community took Subway’s money and gave a character the legal name “Subway,” and the completely absurd sponsorship literally was the joke.

After 30 or 40 episodes of seeing Hyundai and Genesis cars everywhere, I assumed Korean television would be thrilled to leave the badges alone. Then the logos started disappearing, some were covered and others had a completely different emblem in the same spot. Then an unmistakable Hyundai Ioniq 5 appeared with a plain black oval where the H should be, like somebody had given the car a fake mustache even though it was still obviously an Ioniq 5.

I couldn’t name the black oval, but I could show it to Codex, so why not drop the frame into that show’s chat and let it do most of the explaining?

Why an Ioniq 5 had its Hyundai badge covered
  1. You

    That's obviously an Ioniq 5. What the hell is that black oval where the Hyundai badge should be?

  2. Codex

    It's a product-placement rule. Per Korean broadcast rules, paid placement has strict disclosure requirements, and the show can't give the product too much screen time. If Hyundai didn't pay, production can cover the badge so it isn't giving Hyundai an undisclosed ad.

    It's highly unlikely that anybody in Korea is looking at that car and wondering what it is. The giant black oval tells the audience Hyundai did not sponsor this scene. The car is still unmistakably an Ioniq 5, but covering the badge is enough for the placement rule.

The real Ioniq 5 badge is on the left, and the covered badge from True to Love is on the right.

I knew I’d look up why the badge was covered again, and I’d saved the explanation only in the show chat.

if i paid for the tokens, i’m keeping them

If I’d already spent an hour getting an explanation, why leave it in a chat I might never open again? Codex already let me turn repeated instructions into a skill I could call later and keep a useful chat as a document I could point to, so I saved the Kdrama chats too, text and media.

I moved the text into Obsidian, where I already kept my homelab notes as Markdown. Codex could read any server configuration or networking decision I’d written down there, so I threw the half-dictated Kdrama reactions into the same vault.

Saving the Cinderella at 2 AM notes in Obsidian
  1. You

    We've talked a lot about Cinderella at 2 AM in this chat, and I want to save it somewhere. Maybe Obsidian? Go through what we've talked about, organize my thoughts, and save it there.

  2. Codex

    Done. I made a Cinderella at 2 AM note in Obsidian and organized what we'd talked about so you can come back to it later.

Saving the chat as Markdown

I moved the questions and reactions from each show chat into Obsidian as Markdown.

  1. Answer a spoiler-safe question about a scene.
  2. Use earlier context from the same show.
  3. Read the saved show note in a new chat.

Once the chats were in Obsidian, I found the explanation again, but “somewhere around the middle of episode 6” still left me scrubbing through an hour of video, so why not save the exact moment too?

please don’t tell me what happens next

A timestamp would get me back to the scene, and Codex still needed to know that anything after it was off-limits, so I typed the show, episode, rough timestamp, and spoiler cutoff into every question by hand.

Setting the spoiler boundary midway through S01E06
  1. You

    I'm somewhere around the middle of S01E06. Don't use anything from later in the episode or the rest of the show.

Searching for a character was risky because cast pages and thumbnails from later episodes could tell me what happened next, and Google only needs half a name to identify somebody’s biological mother.

Asking about the Ioniq taught me to send the frame first, and IINA, the media player on my Mac, already knew which file it was playing and the exact timestamp. The filename gave me the show, season, episode, and title, and I could pull a small subtitle window around that timestamp. The rest of the episode never entered the chat.

The frame, filename, timestamp, and subtitle window were already there, so why was I still warning Codex about spoilers by hand?

Planning a one-key IINA scene capture
  1. You

    Walk me through how I can set up an IINA script so I can tap a key and send Codex the filename, timestamp, and a still frame of the current scene. Then I want Codex to use all of that with the subtitles to know exactly where I am.

  2. Codex

    Yep. I'd split it into 2 pieces.

    The IINA script can run from a keyboard shortcut, save the current frame, then copy a small scene_capture JSON block with the filename and timestamp. The Kdrama skill can read that block and pull the subtitles around the same point.

    I'd start with 30 seconds before and 30 seconds after, with an option to pull more when the scene needs more context. Then 1 keypress gives Codex the hard facts, and you only have to explain why you stopped there.

Codex wrote a small script that I loaded into IINA and bound to the s key. Now I press s and get the current frame plus a JSON block on my clipboard with the file name, timestamp, bookmark, and snapshot path.

The script handled the keypress, but Codex still needed the same instructions every time, so I turned those instructions into 2 skills I could reuse. The Kdrama skill handles the show note and passes the capture to scene-save, and scene-save reads the JSON and pulls the subtitles around that timestamp for the note.

scene_capture.json
<scene_capture>
{
  "source_type": "sonarr",
  "parsed_metadata": {
    "show": "The Story of Park's Marriage Contract",
    "season": 1,
    "episode": 8,
    "episode_title": "On a Rainy, Windy Day",
    "filename": "The Story of Park's Marriage Contract - S01E08.mkv"
  },
  "video_path": "/TV/Parks-Contract/S01E08.mkv",
  "timestamp_sec": 3226,
  "timestamp_display": "53:46",
  "bookmark_url": "iina-bookmark://open?file=S01E08&start=53:46",
  "snapshot_path": "/captures/parks-contract-s01e08-53m46s.png"
}
</scene_capture>

I pasted the JSON into the show chat and added what I thought was happening and why I cared.

Saving a scene from its exact IINA timestamp
  1. You
    Pasted JSONscene_capture.json
    JSON

    He finally says he likes her, and she gives him about 5 seconds before asking if he's going to run away and hide his pain like an idiot again. Good. He needed the roasting. Save this one.

  2. Codex

    Saved it under The Story of Park's Marriage Contract → scenes as “S01E08 - On a Rainy, Windy Day - Hide Your Pain Like an Idiot.”

    I pulled the local subtitles around 53:46, kept the frame and IINA bookmark, and didn't use anything beyond that scene.

Codex turned the JSON and my half-dictated reaction into an Obsidian note I could reopen weeks later, and I added the cast links afterward.

S01E08 - On a Rainy, Windy Day - Hide Your Pain Like an Idiot.md
---
show: "The Story of Park's Marriage Contract"
season: 1
episode: 8
timestamp_display: "53:46"
screenshot: "../assets/s01e08-hide-your-pain-like-an-idiot-3226.jpg"
characters:
  - "[[cast/Kang Tae-ha]]"
  - "[[cast/Park Yeon-woo]]"
---

## The Scene

After [[cast/Kang Tae-ha|Tae-ha]] admits that he likes her,
[[cast/Park Yeon-woo|Yeon-woo]] asks whether he plans to
hide his pain and keep quiet about it like an idiot.

## The Hit

Good. He needed the roasting.

![Yeon-woo calling Tae-ha an idiot for hiding his pain](../assets/s01e08-hide-your-pain-like-an-idiot-3226.jpg)

[▶ Play in IINA](iina-bookmark://open?file=S01E08&start=53:46)

i know the face, who the hell is that?

The timestamp got me back to the scene, but I still had to match each Korean name to a face by hand, and Plex and Jellyfin already pulled the episode details and character images from TMDB and TheTVDB, so why wasn’t I putting those images beside the names in Obsidian?

Linking character names to cast photos
  1. You

    I recognize the faces. The names still mean absolutely nothing to me. Can you use those APIs to add episode data and in-role cast pictures, then link every character name in a scene note back to the right face?

Kim Mi-so's cast page for What's Wrong with Secretary Kim.

When I draw a blank on a Korean name, I hover over it in Obsidian and see the character in costume. If Codex picked the wrong person, I fix the link.

Hovering over Pil-nam's name opens her cast note inside the saved ramen scene.

2 weeks later, who is anybody?

With the running note, cast pages, saved scenes, and exact spoiler cutoff in one folder, I wondered how much a fresh chat could reconstruct. When I came back 2 weeks later, I pointed one at the show folder.

Resuming The Story of Park's Marriage Contract after 2 weeks
  1. You

    I'm going back to The Story of Park's Marriage Contract after 2 weeks, and I don't remember where I was. Can you remind me what was happening and what I cared about?

  2. Codex

    Based on your last saved scene, you're about 26 minutes into S01E09. Sa-wol has just tried to make peace with Sung-pyo's sister, Na-rae. She admits she's a little jealous because Na-rae matters most to him, and Na-rae agrees they can get along in exchange for kimchi fried rice. You loved how fast Sa-wol went from a nervous apology to excited menu planning.

    Earlier saved scenes from the show had Tae-ha finally admitting he liked Yeon-woo, and you loved that she still called him out for hiding his pain and pushing her away. You were also completely invested in Sa-wol taking charge while Sung-pyo short-circuited around her. She'd already told him they were dating and kissed him across the table when he still needed clarification.

The Play in IINA link took me back to the exact timestamp, and my note reminded me why I’d stopped there.

Then I’d find some old theory about a hand movement and, of course, want another episode.

There is literally no person on Earth I’d make reconstruct 2 weeks of my theories and then get excited about a weird face halfway through episode 9, and Codex can follow all of it, so I don’t have to wonder whether I’m being annoying.

Building a reusable show directory

The scene note kept the exact moment and linked each name to a face. The latest note gave a new chat the spoiler cutoff.

  1. Answer a spoiler-safe question about a scene.
  2. Use earlier context from the same show.
  3. Read the saved show note in a new chat.
  4. Read the latest scene note and rebuild the show context in a new chat.

If one folder gave a fresh chat enough context for one show, what could Codex find across a few dozen of them?

ask me cold and i have almost nothing

I was collecting more little observations than I could remember, so I wrote a short verdict at the top of each show note. Months later, I could read that one line and remember exactly how I’d felt about the show. Somewhere in all of that, there had to be a pattern, unless I’d been inventing one the whole time.

Ask me cold what I like in a Kdrama romance and I have almost nothing, but Codex could compare all the scraps, and I only trusted it when it showed me the scenes.

Comparing scenes about men trying to be sad alone
  1. You

    I've got a lot of scene notes now. Is there anything interesting you notice about what I save?

  2. Codex

    The most recent scene is from Her Private Life. Ryan tells Duk-mi he's fine and wants to be alone. She doesn't believe him for a second, walks in swinging, and punches him in the shoulder for trying to be sad by himself.

    You wrote almost the same complaint in The Story of Park's Marriage Contract, when Yeon-woo called Tae-ha an idiot for hiding his pain.

    Across several shows, you keep saving a man trying to handle something painful alone and a woman who cares enough to call him stupid and refuse to let him disappear.

    I suspect “I care about you, stop being an idiot” isn't only a television preference.

Ryan wanted to be sad alone. Duk-mi decided that was a punchable offense.

Comparing notes across shows

Codex compared saved notes across shows and found reactions I kept having.

I didn’t want to think about Codex’s last sentence yet, and figuring out why Young Lady and Gentleman annoyed me felt much easier.

i only knew i wasn’t enjoying it

Sometimes I don’t know why a show isn’t working for me, I only know it isn’t, and with Young Lady and Gentleman, I couldn’t get any more specific, so I told Codex exactly that and pointed it at the saved notes.

Why Young Lady and Gentleman wasn't working for me
  1. You

    Yeah, Young Lady and Gentleman, or whatever it's called, is another bust. Something's bothering me about the main couple, and I'm not entirely sure why.

  2. Codex

    I checked your saved scenes against the reviews from shows you dropped. The first trait they keep sharing is a noticeable age gap.

    Kdramas tend to treat age differences like this as more normal than Western shows do. Young Lady and Gentleman doesn't treat the roughly 14 years between them as a scandal. You may still hate it.

  3. You

    I mean, that makes sense, and I kind of agree. But what about My Demon? The guy is several hundred years old.

  4. Codex

    That's a little different. You react to the generational difference you can see and hear. The number alone doesn't decide it.

    The actual actors who play the leads, Song Kang and Kim Yoo-jung, are only about 5 years apart. Gu-won and Do-hee also speak with a similar generational tone, which happens to be your generation and probably helps you relate to them. My guess is that you don't perceive an older man dating a much younger woman when you watch them, even if the fantasy lore says he's several hundred years old.

I didn’t like how accurately Codex had read my reactions across the shows, and my personal notes were going to be worse.

My personal directory has years of journal entries about relationships and some very bad times, including the hard decisions I was trying to work through, and Codex already reads those files when I ask it to help me think through something in my life. I knew it was going to tell me something I didn’t want to hear, but screw it, I opened another chat.

Comparing my Kdrama taste with years of personal notes
  1. You

    I have a whole directory of personal notes about my life, the relationships, decisions, and various messes I've tried to work through. Compare it with the Kdrama patterns. Do you see any connections?

  2. Codex

    After going through both directories, I regret to report that your Kdrama notes have become an alarmingly specific bug report about your romantic life.

    You keep saving [REDACTED] whenever [REDACTED], which matches [REDACTED] from the personal notes almost 1-to-1. The same connection shows up around [REDACTED] and [REDACTED].

    I found 6 more. You did ask me to do this.

I was embarrassed by how accurate it was, so I read some of it twice, closed the laptop for a minute, reopened it, and got annoyed that Codex could quote my own notes back at me.

And no, I am absolutely not sharing any of those here.

i have rules for this now

Codex had found the same preferences across several shows and in my personal notes, and if Codex was going to say something that personal, I wanted the rules in a file I could argue with later. A rating left out the reasons and exceptions I cared about, especially when I might save 20 screenshots from a show and drop it anyway.

Turning saved scenes into an updateable Kdrama taste file
  1. You

    Can you make a Kdrama taste file out of all of this that we can keep updating as I watch more?

  2. Codex

    Yep. I started one in your Kdrama directory, and I checked the age-gap idea against Touch and My Man is Cupid too. Here's the age-gap section.

    Kdrama Tastes.md

    ## Soft rules
    
    ### Visible generational difference
    
    *Medium confidence after 4 shows.*
    
    A large age gap tends to bother me when the leads feel like they belong to different generations. The number alone doesn't decide it.
    
    - **Didn't work:** *Young Lady and Gentleman*, *Touch*
    - **Worked anyway:** *My Demon*, *My Man is Cupid*
    

    I linked all 4 show notes in the full file. When another show breaks the rule, you can ask me to change it.

Finding my preference for strong secondary couples
  1. You

    Is there anything else you notice about what I like and what I pay attention to?

  2. Codex

    Yeah. You pay a lot of attention to secondary couples.

    Across 6 shows alone, I count 27 saved scenes that are explicitly about the secondary couple.

    Fight My Way is a notable exception. You got so tired of the secondary couple repeating the same fight that you started skipping their scenes, and the ending didn't win you back. You seem to care when the secondary couple feels completely different from the leads and has enough chemistry to matter on its own.

    This looks like a strong preference. It won't decide the whole show for you, but it helps.

Building a taste file

I asked Codex to test its first guesses against more shows and keep the rules soft.

Once those rules were written down, I didn’t want to spend another 16 hours on the wrong show.

okay, but will i like it?

For each new show, I opened a chat and had the Kdrama skill load the taste file, then asked about the premise and relationship setup. I left the ending off-limits and tried Jealousy Incarnate first.

Checking Jealousy Incarnate against my taste file
  1. You

    Would I like Jealousy Incarnate?

  2. Codex

    No. I'd skip this one.

    The whole show is built around your least favorite kind of love triangle, 1 woman stuck between 2 men who both remain plausible options for far too long.

    You also have an inconvenient habit of feeling bad for the man who won't get picked. Once that happens, the romance stops being fun and you spend the rest of the show waiting for him to get hurt.

    You'd probably enjoy some of the early chemistry. You'd still have 24 episodes of the triangle to sit through, and by the end you'd probably be annoyed with all 3 of them.

    The early chemistry won't make those 24 episodes feel shorter.

Codex said I might like some of the early chemistry, so I ignored everything else it had said and made it through 6 episodes.

After that, I asked about The Law Cafe, and Codex was much more confident.

Checking The Law Cafe against my taste file
  1. You

    Would I like The Law Cafe?

  2. Codex

    Yes. Absolutely.

    There's 1 clear primary couple, and their chemistry is ridiculous.

    Yu-ri, the female lead, is loud, brash, completely unapologetic, and confident. Jung-ho can hold his own with everybody else. Around her, he's shy and awkward, and she can fluster him whenever she wants.

    They're both seasoned lawyers, which gives them far too much training for this. If bickering had a professional league, they'd both have guaranteed contracts.

    They fight like they're still in middle school, except now the arguments involve actual laws and threats of bodily harm. Sometimes Yu-ri shoves him onto the nearest couch and gets close enough that he forgets how language works.

    He could push back. Mostly he turns red and complains. He still goes exactly where she puts him.

    I think he likes it.

    They're going to make you laugh. I think you're going to love the show.

Sure enough, by the time I finished watching The Law Cafe, I’d saved 30+ scenes and greatly enjoyed the conclusion, so Codex absolutely nailed this one.

fine, codex was right. what did it miss?

Codex had predicted I’d like Love Your Enemy too, and I finished it.

Updating the taste file after 3 more shows
  1. You

    I've finished The Law Cafe and Love Your Enemy, and Jealousy Incarnate was a bust. Go through those show directories and update the taste file with anything new.

  2. Codex

    Done. Some rules were new, and a few earlier ones got much stronger after going through all 3.

    A physically dominant female lead is a very good sign. Yu-ri shoves Jung-ho around like she expects him to cooperate, and Yun Ji-won can pull Seok Ji-won out of a soccer game by his face. Both men complain. Neither puts up much resistance.

    The sad-alone thing got stronger. You keep liking emotionally repressed men who withdraw the second something hurts, usually followed by a woman who refuses to let them get away with it.

    You want both leads to be competent. Their personal lives can be completely ridiculous, but neither character can be useless everywhere else.

    You love petty problems that everybody treats like an emergency. The bigger the reaction gets over something stupid, the funnier it is to you.

    And since you still tried Jealousy Incarnate, I strengthened 2 warnings.

    A 2-men-1-woman love triangle is close to a hard stop. You start feeling for the man who doesn't get picked, and the romance stops being fun.

    The show can't drag out the choice forever. The early chemistry got you through 6 episodes, but by then the triangle had stopped being funny and you were tired of watching 3 adults turn indecision into a lifestyle.

    I added these as general guidelines for what works for you and what doesn't, with links back to the show notes behind them.

I still decide when the taste file changes.

Eventually I want the Kdrama skill checking it whenever I save a scene or leave a verdict, but I haven’t told it to do that yet. I have no idea how many scenes should change a rule built across several shows.

Most of the time, I don’t know what I’m saving a scene for, and when something makes me stop, I press s and tell Codex why, then go back to the episode.

I might not touch the note for months, then another show makes the old reaction look familiar and I finally know what to ask.

I built a spoiler-bounded multimodal context protocol because everybody except me knew the ramen was about sex.

FitClick a detail to zoom